Entre a continuidade e a ruptura: uma análise dos programas federais de segurança pública dos governos FHC, Lula e Dilma

Abstract

Despite the prominence that the theme of urban violence has taken on since the redemocratization of Brazilian society, since then, we have witnessed a succession of experiences that point more to rupture than to continuity in terms of public security policies. From FHC to Dilma, passing through two terms of the Lula government, federal public security programs have been formulated, implemented and, quickly, abandoned or modified. The present study aims to carry out a bibliographical review with essayed base about the public security policies implemented by the federal government in the mandates of FHC, Lula and Dilma, using a historical institutionalist perspective complementing with the bibliographical analysis of the public security area, we seek understand how and why the ruptures and continuities of federal public security plans in Brazil have affected the control of violent crime. The institutionalist and public policy literature raises a set of hypotheses to explain this phenomenon, making a survey on what the greatest specialists in the national scene have argued on the subject, we will explore, especially, the cooperative limits between the federal actors (federal government, states and municipalities) as a hypothesis to explain the factors that interfere with these ruptures in the national plans from government to government, taking into account the weight of social and historical structures on the functioning of the security institutions active in the FHC (1995-1998; 1999- 2002), Lula (2003-2006; 2007-2010) and Dilma (2011-2014; 2015-2016) governments.