Análise dos indicadores para dimensionamento de vagas docentes na UFAL

Abstract

In Federal Institutions of Higher Education, as well as in other public organizations, in addition to the demand for transparency and accountability, the demand for quality services increases every day. Determining efficiency as one of the purposes to be pursued by the public administrator has a scope beyond what the ordinary citizen expects from the state, marking a duty of office of the public administration under penalty of liability of its agents. For the people manager, giving effect to the principle of efficiency implies the availability of personnel in satisfactory number and quality to meet public policies and services that must be provided to citizens. Defining how many and which positions will serve these services is a job to be developed within a personnel sizing policy. Thus, this work aimed to compare the model proposed by Mec / Andifes at the Federal University of Alagoas, as well as to analyze indicators for the dimensioning and allocation of teaching staff that meets the particularities of the institution, using the action research method combined with bibliographic, documentary research and semi-structured interviews with teachers and managers. It was possible to notice that UFAL does not adopt the teaching vacancy allocation model proposed by MEC and follows its own rules for apportioning vacancies. This does not mean that the university is less efficient than those that use the model, since the model proposed by the MEC does not suit the particularities of all higher education institutions.