Decisão do Tribunal de Contas : contexto, produção jurídica e controle judicial

Abstract

The dissertation discusses the judging competence of the Court of Auditors (art. 71, II, CF / 88), which is autonomous constitutional body, head of the state function of external control of public accounts. With the aim to contextualize the theme, it intends to explain the terms "control" and "external control", the institutional position of the Audit Court among the three "Powers", the legal nature of its adjudicative competence and the "administrative res judicata". Then, it tries to examine the legal standards that govern the juridical production process under the Court of Auditors, which are the standard of competence, the standard that regulates the procedure and the standard that defines the matter which is object of the decision. From the incidence main rule technique, it is explained the previous (material, spatial and temporal) and consequent (personal and relative to prestation) integrants criteria of the legal rules that impose duties and sanctions against those responsible for the management of public resources. And since the application of such standards may involve injury or threat to rights of the controlled individuals, it is also analyzed, taking into account the doctrine and jurisprudence, the question of the action limits of the Judiciary due to the existence of formal and material defects in the judgment of the Court of Auditors.