O determinante social da violência doméstica e familiar contra a mulher, no Município de Maceió, no ano de 2018

Abstract

The present work dealt with domestic and family violence against women in the city of Maceió. Thus, it aims to analyze the social determinant of domestic and family violence in the city of Maceió, in the year 2018. Bibliographic and documentary research was used as methodological procedure, having as empirical material that constituted the research corpus, the analysis of documents that make up the socio-legal framework, such as the 1988 Federal Constitution, Law no 11.340/06 (Maria da Penha Law) designed to adequately punish and restrain acts of domestic violence against women (primary source), psychosocial records (primary source) provided by the Court of Violence against women in the city of Maceió. These were discussions related to the historical contextualization of domestic and family violence against women; the State's network of confrontation in combating this type of violence, citing in general terms, the court of violence against women, as well as outlining and analyzing the profile of the victim in the city of Maceió in search of the social determinant of domestic violence against women. It reveals the historical trajectory about the socio-historical construction of the concept of gender and its inequalities, demonstrates the roles determined by society established for men and women, discussing domestic violence in the Brazilian socioeconomic and cultural context, in addition to references about the Maria da Penha Law and your devices. Still, it was necessary to understand, above all, gender violence as one of the expressions of the social issue, where issues related to the categories of gender, social class, race/ethnicity and even generational that shape this space of violence are interwoven. The present study also draws attention to the fact that, as important as the Network for Confronting Violence against Women that offers specialized services, are public policies with essential services, as they intervene in isolation in the problem of violence against women, without questioning, critically analyzing bourgeois sociability, only a palliative “service” of damage repair is possible, and the problem is not fully addressed.