A escrita, o outro e as construções de sentidos: intervenções dialógicas em reelaboração textual

Abstract

This research aimed to analyze the rewriting and discursive organization of the text based on the interventions between interested interlocutors (BAZARIM, 2006) from an exotopic look. In this context, it was questioned: what is the role of the other in the discursive development of the text? How does the author rewrite the text based on the other's intervention? This paper is an action research (THIOLLENTT, 2011) type of applied qualitative study (CHIZZOTTI, 2010; LUDKE; ANDRÉ, 1986; MOITA LOPES, 2006). To build up this research, we used different strategies and instruments for data collection, as follows: 1) observations and participations of classes; 2) recordings and transcriptions of the students and the full professor discourses, as well as the researcher teacher, during the writing and rewriting activities in the classroom; 3) annotations of class events, and 4) interventions in production practices and textual rewritings. For the data analysis, we relied on Mikhail Bakhtin's (2011) theory of heteroscientificity. And, based on this idea, we seek to collate with other voices that theorize and resonate the dialogical perspective of the Bakhtinian Circle in the construction of being in eventicity. This interaction of dialogical voices has resulted in theoretical enrichment to the following analysis categories: unfinished (BAKHTIN, 2011); interested interlocution as mediation (BAZARIM, 2006); and active responsive response (BAKHTIN, 2011). The results show us that the unfinished discursiveness in the texts of this research generates responsiveness in the listener (reader), who, understanding the enunciation, responds actively. The investigation also reveals that in the process of textual production the other takes a significant place in the rewriting of the meanings of the text through its replica, that allows the resumption of the author's ideas through the interweaving of other voices. The dissertation content, in concluding notes, indicates that the other, due to its excess vision, has a relevant and determining role in the organizational and uninterrupted chain of discourse in the text.