A dualidade do discurso sobre o PL do aborto e o grito: criança não é mãe, estuprador não é pai

Abstract

This research aims to conceive and distinguish the different understandings and the defense of the points of view of two different sides about the discourse generated about the debates that circulate about the abortion bill in Brazil, considering the statement that is being propagated by the national media: "A child is not a mother, a rapist is not a father", which further elucidates the unequal scenarios, where one class defends abortion and the other class criminalizes, even in situations where the conception of the fetus occurs through rape of a vulnerable person. In order to broaden the discourse on the subject under investigation, it was necessary to scrutinize the manifestation that highlights the issue of abortion. In order to be able to make such a diagnosis, it was necessary to make use of the theoretical basis referenced by the writers Michel Pêcheux, Eni Orlandi and Ana Gama Florêncio. The structure that makes up the aforementioned discursive analysis was outlined through investigations on the websites of the magazines www.brasil247.com/brasil/ and lupa.uol.com.br that deal with the dialogues that built this controversy and explain the vision of what PL 1904/2024 is about. Subsequently, excerpts from the speeches were used in order to carry out the analysis of the discourse, starting from the debate and the exposing speeches, in the search to understand the different views and approach to the theme that has generated a constant argumentation and dispute on both sides, those who defend abortion and those who do not, under any circumstances. In view of the entire conception of the investigation, it is emphasized that the manifestation published by the magazine Brasil247 and lupa.uol.com.br sought to argue about this social crisis, where society attributes a responsibility for the conception of human life and its defense. Thus, it is possible to verify that the discourses that permeated these discourses and conveyed by the magazines, They point out which arguments are valid and important for society to really understand what is being fought for and why it is being fought. The points addressed and presented lead to the understanding that abortion becomes a case of public policies and, even more, a case of public health, this arouses the interest in thinking about the most viable ways to promote health and life.