Rediscutindo o desenvolvimento econômico a partir da visão novo desenvolvimentista: em busca de um novo paradigma

Abstract

This work seeks to make a brief analysis of some of the main theories of economic thought that are more focused on the focus of development and their respective models of economic growth and development. To this end, it asks whether it would be the most appropriate economic growth / development model. Therefore, having as main focus the new developmentalist web. And yet, we try to ask the following question: does the proposal of the new developmental theory, in fact, innovate in relation to the others? Therefore, the objective was to investigate whether, in fact, the new developmental theory represents a new paradigm for economic development, that is, whether its proposals really represent something new. In addition, check if your proposals have an empirical basis, with Brazil as the country of analysis. In this work, a brief analysis of the history of economic development was developed in the first moment, followed by a demonstration of some models of economic growth and part of the classical economic thought of development, in the second chapter. It follows with an exposition of the new developmental theory and some counterpoints to it. In the fourth part is inserted the methodology of the work in which it was performed through bibliographical and documentary analysis and through analysis of empirical data. In the fifth part it brings the results in which some of the main ideas of the new developmental theory are confirmed, as for example, that the exchange rate remained very appreciated in the long run. Which in turn caused significant losses for the Brazilian industry. In addition to demonstrating some of the main differences between the theoretical models under analysis. Thus, through a brief historical analysis it is demonstrated that it cannot be said that the new developmentalism does not represent a paradigm break. Thus, it is concluded that the main proposals of the new developmentalism remain coherent with regard to some of the empirical analyzes that were carried out in this work. However, as it is still in the process of empirical review, it does not yet represent a paradigm break.